9 Comments

"This is why they have failed to understand the grave problem of the maldistribution of wealth that has grown out of the fact that a minuscule percentage of the world's people have come to control and consume the vast majority of the earth's land and natural resources."

"They" haven't failed. On the contrary. If you read Carroll Quigley's book "Tragedy And Hope" you will see that this has been the CFR's (read: the globalists, or as James Corbett and I call them, the powers that shouldn't be) goal since its creation in 1921.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=carroll+quigley+tragedy+and+hope&ia=web

Another thing..... I cannot for the life of me understand the need for politicians, or for them to sit in the council of my home town, the capitol of my country, or in Bazel, Brussels or New York City and decide what I am allowed to do, or not in great detail. I am an adult who knows right from wrong, and I don't need any of them to tell me anything.

Now I'll continue reading. ;-)

Expand full comment
author

Perhaps you are using it to get attention. Okay, you got my attention.

Expand full comment

"This is the new territorial imperative, the new democratic covenant, and the higher synthesis resolving what has been the difficult and too-often-destructive dialectic of left versus right."

The left/right paradigm is a false one. It is created by the afforementioned powers that shouldn't be so that you and I are at each other's throats over petty bovine fecal matter to prevent us from teaming up against them. We are many, and they are few. They wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell if we all teamed up against them, and they know it.

The jig is now up since less that 1,5% are saying they will take another dose of their Deathvaxx™ bio-weapon. They are scared shitless right now. Globalism should be left in history's dust bin.

Expand full comment

The actual cause of the landowners feeling that they are the same kinds of business-men as are capitalists, was due not to Adam Smith but much later when John Bates Clark and his company claimed that these two kind were of the same type when it can to doing business. He did this in order to gain the support of the landed commercial concerns of that tine about 1900 in the industrialized US. That was a time of great expansion and progress and there was some fear within the likes of Roosevelt as president, that without giving these industrialists full support the recovery from the previous civil war and unrest would cease.

This was in complete opposition to the philosophy of Henry George who did not really have much chance due to their huge political pressure against land value taxation. Things have not changed all that much today except that some variation on LVT has been proposed as land ownership by large cooperatives instead of individuals, with the ground rent in the form of lease-fees being collected in lieu of some of the taxes that would otherwise be paid by the tenants.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment